










|
What Is Truth?
Jack Critchfield
"That which has been is what will be, That which is done is what will be done, And there is nothing new
under the sun" (Eccl 1:9 NKJV). When, in about 977BC, Solomon penned these now famous words, I doubt he understood
how true would these words ring almost 3000 years later.
It has been said that we must continue to evolve and that we are faced with things in this generation that no one
before has ever had to face. There may be a certain amount of truth in this statement, in regard to the specifics
of the situation, but there is no truth in it as to the general relationship it bears with those of the past.
One such example can be found in what is believed today. When Jesus was taken before Pilate He made this statement
in response to one of Pilate's questions, "You say rightly that I am a king. For this cause I was born, and
for this cause I have come into the world, that I should bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth
hears My voice" (John 18:37 NKJV). Pilate's reply reflects the attitude of so many in their study of God's
word. He said, "What is truth?" (John 18:38 NKJV), as if it was not possible to know for certain where
truth lies. We have been told for so many years that because of upbringing, cultural differences and economic diversity,
no one can really know for certain what is truth. Many in the Lord's church have now come to accept the idea as
being a fact.
Many now see the Bible as a good guide, but do not recognize that it is absolute in its truth. They teach that
we must allow each to interpret the Bible in light of their own experiences and come to an understanding that is
in line with their background. Yet these same people will readily accept that when teaching mathematics, for example,
truth is not reliant on one's background, but is instead absolute, and must be understood by all alike.
The Bible is no different. Jesus said in John 17:17, "Sanctify them by Your truth. Your word is truth."
What God says is not dependent on how I was brought up or what I was taught to believe. It is dependent on what
God intended for us to understand. Jesus also said in John 8:24, "And you shall know the truth, and the truth
shall make you free." If truth is relevant, how can it ever set us free from our sins? If God expects His
people to, "all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly
joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment" (1 Cor. 1:10), we must be able to discern truth
alike.
The apostle Paul said, "For this reason I, Paul, the prisoner of Christ Jesus for you Gentiles; if indeed
you have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which was given to me for you, how that by revelation He
made known to me the mystery (as I have briefly written already, by which, when you read, you may understand my
knowledge in the mystery of Christ)" (Eph. 3:1-4 NKJV). You see how Paul says that the Ephesian brethren would
be able to know the mystery that he himself knew by reading what he had written. If each one put a different meaning
on the truth that Paul had written, they would not understand what was written, but would be following their own
desires. If truth is relevant, why did Paul say it could be understood alike?
Peter conveyed much the same thought in his second letter. Knowing that he did not have much longer to live he
said this, "For this reason I will not be negligent to remind you always of these things, though you know
and are established in the present truth. Yes, I think it is right, as long as I am in this tent, to stir you up
by reminding you, knowing that shortly I must put off my tent, just as our Lord Jesus Christ showed me. Moreover
I will be careful to ensure that you always have a reminder of these things after my decease" (2 Pet 1:12-15
NKJV). The reminder of these things was, of course, the letters he had written.
We could continue this journey through the word of God to show that the inspired writers believed we could and
would understand what truth is, but Jude 3 may be the most telling of all the passages we could look at. Jude wrote,
"Beloved, while I was very diligent to write to you concerning our common salvation, I found it necessary
to write to you exhorting you to contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints."
Jude says the faith was delivered once. That does not leave room for my interpretation or anyone else's either.
If it was once delivered, then it can not be delivered again, which means it is not going to change over time.
Pilate's question still lingers over the centuries, with some wanting to give the answer, "Who knows?"
But God has left us the truth in the words penned by the inspired writers and we can know if we have the truth
or not, by honestly comparing what we believe with what God says in His word. Can two disagree as to what the word
of God says? Certainly, but only to the point of studying until they come to agreement with the word of God. Remember
"God is not the author of confusion but of peace" (1 Cor. 14:33). Therefore the confusion over what God's
word says, must come from man. Let us always strive to conform to the will of God rather than our own will.
|